“We top the best of the worst lists,” says Sanford Johson, an advocate of comprehensive sex ed and the head of Mississippi First. Along with having one of the nations highest teen pregnancy rates, Mississippi is currently first in the nation for child poverty and increases in HIV infections among young adults.
We are reluctant, and we mean that, to report that researchers have stumbled upon what they are calling a potentially effective, inexpensive and (mostly) harmless method of male birth control, really a holy grail of sorts for contraception.
- Of course, by “stumbled upon” what they really mean is that researchers have known about this simple treatment for four decades and, presumably because it is so much easier to let women worry about birth control, are only getting around to it now.
- Of course, by “inexpensive,” what they really mean is that now they think they can finally make some money off the idea.
- And, of course, by “(mostly) harmless” what they really mean is that it certainly seems that way when you are doing it to laboratory rats.
But it is science, so let us give them a break. It turns out that if you apply 1 to 3 megahertz of ultrasound — that is on the low end of what would be experienced by a pregnant woman — to a man’s saline-soaked jubblies, you end up seriously discombobulating the “boys.” In clinical terms, this is referred to as depleting the “spermatocytes and spermatids” and reducing the “epididymal sperm reserves.” In real life, we’re guessing, you would just feel silly having your squirrel food snug in someone’s laboratory equipment.
But kinectically activating the kanakas is no sophomoric joke. It thins the duck butter to just 3 million fighting men per load. That might seem like a lot, but researchers refer to it as a “Sperm Index Count of zero,” which you have to admit sounds pretty good for birth control you could (not really) rig up from a dollar-an-hour motel bed. Judgy doctors usually tell you that you have a low sperm count if it drops under 20 million per milliliter, which obviously is a case of swollen apples to distended oranges.
Anyway, the optimal magic-finger treatment for the love apples, in turns out, is two 15-minute sessions of “3 MHz ultrasound at 2.2 Watt per square cm” with a two-day breather in between. In other words, not much different from what doctors tell old men before they go to Vegas.
Researchers are not totally convinced, of course. A few things have to be checked out first, including, not surprisingly, the potential long-term effects of vibrating your clangers, and whether this whole thing can be turned around so women have to do it instead.
via RB&E | Abstract | Therapeutic ultrasound as a potential male contraceptive: power, frequency and temperature required to deplete rat testes of meiotic cells and epididymides of sperm determined using a commercially available system and Sonicating sperm — the future of male contraception.
- Ultrasound one step closer to killing sperm–and the vasectomy (news.cnet.com)
- Ultrasound Male Contraception (eoghann.com)
- Potential For Male Contraception By Sonicating Sperm (medicalnewstoday.com)
- The Sound of Sterility (spectrum.ieee.org)
- Ultrasound could give men birth control option, study finds (thestar.com)
- Sperm Zapping: New Male Birth Control? (newsy.com)
- Cosmopolitan: Really Sexy Stuff:A Crazy New Method of Male Birth Control (cosmopolitan.com)
- Hitting Testicles (with Ultrasound Pulses) May Be an Effective Contraceptive (neatorama.com)
When pro-choice feminists like Wolf, or liberal men, or a lot of women, even, say things like, “I’m pro-choice, but I am uncomfortable with… [third-trimester abortion / sex-selection / women who have multiple abortions / women who have abortions for “convenience” / etc.]” then what you are saying is that your discomfort matters more than an individual woman’s ability to assess her own circumstances. That you don’t think that women who have abortions think through the very questions that you, sitting there in your easy chair, can come up with. That a woman who is contemplating an invasive, expensive, and uncomfortable medical procedure doesn’t think it through first. In short, that your judgment is better than hers.
- The global abortion rate was stable between 2003 and 2008, with rates of 29 and 28 abortions per 1000 women aged 15—44 years, respectively, following a period of decline from 35 abortions per 1000 women in 1995.
- Worldwide, 49% of abortions were unsafe in 2008, compared to 44% in 1995.
- About one in five pregnancies ended in abortion in 2008.
- The abortion rate was lower in subregions where more women live under liberal abortion laws.
- Daily chart: Global abortion rates | The Economist (policyabcs.wordpress.com)
- Back-street abortions rise (emedicalpoint.wordpress.com)
- Unsafe abortions rise as contraceptive funding is cut – Andy Coghlan – NewScientist (richarddawkins.net)
- Unsafe Abortion on the increase in Africa, a new WHO Report reveals. (africahealth.wordpress.com)
- Abortion rate decline stalls, unsafe abortions rise (kractivist.wordpress.com)